Perhaps you said you would start waking up an hour earlier so you can exercise, or you’ve sworn off some specific type of food, only to find yourself having periodic success. For behaviors that carry health risks, like smoking or drug use, abstinence can also be an effective way to improve health outcomes. Research suggests that online therapy can be effective in treating things like gambling disorders and helping with smoking cessation. It has also been shown to promote a decrease in symptoms of anxiety, depression, and specific phobias, all which have a comorbid relationship with substance use disorders.

At Risk for Relapse?

You have not unchanged all that you have changed in your life to support your recovery. Abstinence can be considered a decision to avoid behaviors that are risky in and of themselves, like using drugs. That said, abstinence can also come from a desire to avoid a potential high-risk situation later on. For example, someone might decide to quit smoking to lower their health risks later in life, even if a single cigarette might not be life-threatening in the moment.

Changing how recovery is viewed

• People in recovery may experience a return to a cycle of active addiction when they relapse.
• As a result, when they are abstinent for a period, they will notice their tolerance has declined, making it possible for them to overdose if they start using again at the same level as before.
• A person with alcohol use disorder (AUD) may feel like drinking when out with friends at their favorite hangout, for example.
• A person who can execute effective coping strategies (e.g. a behavioural strategy, such as leaving the situation, or a cognitive strategy, such as positive self-talk) is less likely to relapse compared with a person lacking those skills.
• Evidence of the abstinence violation effect can be seen in any individual who attributes a lapse and subsequent relapse to entirely uncontrollable conditions, such as a perceived character flaw or adherence to the constraints of addiction.
• Similarly, someone trying to quit smoking might smoke a whole pack of cigarettes after just having one.
• This stage is characterized by anxiety, depression, loneliness, and irritability.

Taylor uses an app to watch her intake of calorie limit and does see positive outcomes to her new lifestyle. One night, she craves pizza and wings, orders out, and goes over her calories for the day. CP conceptualized the manuscript, conducted literature searches, synthesized the literature, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SD assisted with conceptualization of the review, and SD and KW both identified relevant literature for the review and provided critical review, commentary and revision. Set realistic expectations for your recovery journey, understanding that progress may not always be linear. Depending on the substance used, addiction may also have the potential to damage the brain itself.

AVE in the Context of the Relapse Process

Taylor may think, “All that good work down the drain, I am never going to be able to keep this up for my life.” Like Jim, this may also trigger a negative mindset Halfway house and a return to unhealthy eating and a lack of physical exercise. The abstinence violation effect is a complex phenomenon that usually needs to be approached from several different directions to be handled effectively.

• This aspect of relapse prevention can be beneficial to those in addiction treatment or contemplating treatment since it is not necessarily a failure to exercise self-control or abstain from using a substance of abuse.
• In high-risk situations, the person expects alcohol to help him or her cope with negative emotions or conflict (i.e. when drinking serves as “self-medication”).
• If you were initially treated for an addiction disorder, that therapist can provide additional help.
• Instead of viewing the incident as a temporary setback, the individual perceives it as evidence of personal failure, leading to increased feelings of guilt, shame, and hopelessness (Collins & Witkiewitz, 2013; Larimer, Palmer, & Marlatt, 1999).
• This can lead to a full relapse by making someone believe that because they’ve already messed up, there is no hope of achieving sobriety.
• You don’t have to wait until a relapse occurs to seek help if you are concerned that you might be headed for a relapse.

This SMART Recovery site doesn’t match your location

It arises when a person starts to feel that when a lapse occurs, it is indicative of a moral failure, loss of hope for continued recovery, or proof that recovery is ultimately not possible. This is a common risk factor, but psychologists, rehabilitation professionals, and treatment centers work hard to combat it because it’s generally not constructive for the individual’s future success. Once relapsed, this strongly held belief increases the likelihood of relapse. An individual who feels guilt often uses substances to ease their guilt, which can lead to AVE. Guilt is a difficult emotion for someone to bear, one that can constantly replay in their minds, leading them to use substances again. When one returns to substance use after a period of abstinence, they experience a negative cognitive and affective reaction known as an abstinence violation effect in psychotherapy.

For many with serious substance abuse problems, any drug or alcohol use can be problematic. If they drink or drug again, they can slip into full-blown relapse, even after months or years of abstinence. For some, even a brief lapse may generate so much self-doubt, guilt, and a belief about personal failure, that the person gives up and continues to use. The AVE in addiction is systemic, and some experts believe that too few treatment modalities identify both the mechanisms that lead to addictive disorders and the ones that keep them in place, even years after a client seems to have recovered. Focusing on recovery as a continual path of growth, learning, and changing can be one of the most important ways that clinicians and individuals with substance use disorders can counter the inaccuracies present in the way we think about addiction.

• Some people feel more comfortable or supported by meeting with this type of professional in person.
• Chronic stressors may also overlap between self-efficacy and other areas of intrapersonal determinants, like emotional states, by presenting more adaptational strain on the treatment-seeking client4.
• Because emotional relapses occur so deeply below the surface in your mind, they can be incredibly difficult to recognize.
• A person who has abused a substance for a long time is likely to have a higher tolerance for its effects.

In a similar fashion, the nature of these attributions determines whether the violation will lead to full-blown relapse. In conclusion, the abstinence violation effect is a psychological effect that impacts those in recovery, as well as those who are focused on making more positive behavioral choices in their lives. By reframing lapses as learning opportunities and teachable moments, cultivating self-compassion, and seeking support, individuals can navigate these challenges more effectively, increasing their chances of leading a healthier lifestyle. Self-efficacy is defined as the degree to which an individual feels confident and capable of performing certain behaviour in a specific situational context5. Although many view recovery as a static state that must be achieved, practitioners and individuals working to combat the AVE recognize that recovery is a spectrum, and that lapse and relapse operate on that spectrum.

Physical Relapse

You don’t have to wait until a relapse occurs to seek help if you are concerned that you might be headed for a relapse. There are some common early psychological signs that you might be on the way to a relapse. abstinence violation effect Advocates of nonabstinence approaches often point to indirect evidence, including research examining reasons people with SUD do and do not enter treatment. This literature – most of which has been conducted in the U.S. – suggests a strong link between abstinence goals and treatment entry. The study was especially notable because most other treatment readiness measures have been validated on treatment-seeking samples (see Freyer et al., 2004).